petermarcus: (Default)
petermarcus ([personal profile] petermarcus) wrote2005-06-29 03:17 pm

Supreme Court followup

Followup here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050629/ap_on_re_us/souter_property

"Am I taking this seriously? But of course," said Charles Meany, Weare's code enforcement officer. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin."

Still amused.

i posted this earlier, but...

[identity profile] ryanvt.livejournal.com 2005-07-06 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
because it was an old post, you probably didn't see it. the court was just interpreting the current law. the law's to blame, not the interpretation. they avoided judicial activism. i don't think anyone (even the justices) likes the law. congress! please change it!

Re: i posted this earlier, but...

[identity profile] macaholic.livejournal.com 2005-07-06 03:22 am (UTC)(link)
like I said, this goes beyond interpretation.