Supreme Court followup

[petermarcus]

Followup here: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050629/ap_on_re_us/souter_property

"Am I taking this seriously? But of course," said Charles Meany, Weare's code enforcement officer. "In lieu of the recent Supreme Court decision, I would imagine that some people are pretty much upset. If it is their right to pursue this type of end, then by all means let the process begin."

Still amused.

Comments

[alladinsane.livejournal.com]

[petermarcus.livejournal.com]

Quite appropriate ;)

[macaholic.livejournal.com]

Seems he sees the economic advantages of such an arrangement....*ahem*

i posted this earlier, but...

[ryanvt.livejournal.com]

because it was an old post, you probably didn't see it. the court was just interpreting the current law. the law's to blame, not the interpretation. they avoided judicial activism. i don't think anyone (even the justices) likes the law. congress! please change it!

Re: i posted this earlier, but...

[macaholic.livejournal.com]

like I said, this goes beyond interpretation.