Sep. 19th, 2002

petermarcus: (eye)
Round two of my "Ask Me Anything" lemming poll:

[livejournal.com profile] plural Excellent question. In order: Dinner, inflatable mattress, dessert, comic relief.

[livejournal.com profile] topazgrrl Yep, in a heartbeat.

[livejournal.com profile] xandria I'd have to go with the eyes.

[livejournal.com profile] nefas No, can't say that I have :) I've often needed adjusting in the other direction, though.
petermarcus: (Default)
One of the secret fun things about working in the telephone industry is that I have to make a lot of calls to make sure things are working correctly.

Like now -- my international calling is up, but I'm having terrible quality problems. They're working on it, but to test, I have to call a lot of international numbers. I just called the Hilton hotel in Mexico City, a computer business in London, and a resort in Costa Rica, just to see what the line quality was like. It's fun -- kinda like instant travel :)
petermarcus: (Default)
Keep 'em coming -- you're asking some good questions

[livejournal.com profile] wrapper At this point, I don't see anything dragging me away :)

[livejournal.com profile] ly Yes, I honestly do. I'd like to test that out someday soon.

[livejournal.com profile] beckmermaid A 1st edition of Raymond Chandler's The Big Sleep

[livejournal.com profile] epiphany I don't know, and I've been thinking about that for the last month or so. Slowness, I think.
petermarcus: (Default)
I love politics, just for the sheer insanity of it all.

This implies that the government knew about bits and pieces of 9/11 and should have tried to stop it.

These protesters imply that the government shouldn't be so hasty to do anything, militarily, with Iraq.

This implies that the government is shrugging off its responsibility to protect cyberspace by taking a hands-off attitude.

This implies that the government is too hands-on in its measures to secure America.

----

This is politics in America -- one twisted paradox. And we wonder why our leaders look into our eyes and lie to us? Even with a 70% approval rating, Bush is attacked from all sides in a damned if you do, damned if you don't struggle. Clinton, for many different reasons, had the same problem. As did Bush I and Reagan and Carter and Ford.... Everyone was annoyed at Nixon at the end, one of the last nearly unanimous political environments and the sleazy weasel had to go and do the right thing and resign on us.

The really twisted thing of it all is that it's a really great system. We should pester leaders who want to march us off to war. Is this really about WMD, or is it oil? We should pester our leaders about what allowed an attack on our soil. Was it an intelligence breakdown or was it inevitable? We should demand security, while monitoring that it doesn't go too far. Government may have internal checks and balances, but it has no external ones outside its civilians. Who will stop a CEO that steals money from a company and its stockholders? The government, through the process of law. Who will stop a government that steps on the Constitution in the name of protection?

Profile

petermarcus: (Default)
petermarcus

January 2012

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 29th, 2025 09:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios